The lawyer representing businessman Ahmed Rashad has denied claims made by Yara Hossam Hassan’s defense that his client received the jewelry in question.
The lawyer stressed that Ahmed Rashad did not receive the jewelry, rejecting the account presented by Yara Hossam Hassan’s defense.
Ahmed Rashad Maintains His Legal Position
Ahmed Rashad’s lawyer reaffirmed his client’s legal position, stressing that the facts surrounding the dispute will be established through documents and legal procedures before the competent investigative authorities and court.
The statement came in response to claims made by Yara Hossam Hassan’s defense regarding whether the jewelry had been returned to Ahmed Rashad.
Yara Hossam Hassan’s Defense Presents Its Account
Yara Hossam Hassan’s lawyer had claimed that Ahmed Rashad received the jewelry from his client and said that there were witnesses to the alleged handover.
Ahmed Rashad’s defense has categorically rejected that account.
The documents and judicial proceedings are expected to determine the facts surrounding the disputed jewelry.
Yara Hossam Hassan’s Appeal Postponed
The competent appellate court decided on Saturday to postpone Yara Hossam Hassan’s appeal against a ruling ordering her to return Ahmed Rashad’s jewelry until October 15.
The jewelry is valued at EGP 3.65 million plus USD 41,500.
Details of the Jewelry Dispute
The case concerns allegations that Yara Hossam Hassan retained valuable gold jewelry that businessman Ahmed Rashad had given her during their engagement.
Following the end of the engagement, the dispute centered on whether the jewelry had been returned to Ahmed Rashad.
The allegations and counterclaims remain subject to review by the competent judicial authorities pending further proceedings and final rulings.
Did Ahmed Rashad receive the jewelry?
His lawyer denies that he received the jewelry and rejects the account presented by Yara Hossam Hassan’s defense.
What did Yara Hossam Hassan’s defense claim?
Her lawyer claimed that Ahmed Rashad received the jewelry and said there were witnesses to the alleged handover.
When is the next appeal hearing?
The appeal has been postponed until October 15.
How much is the disputed jewelry worth?
The jewelry is valued at EGP 3.65 million plus USD 41,500.
What is the case about?
The case concerns a dispute over gold jewelry given during an engagement and whether it was returned after the engagement ended.
