The Alexandria Economic Misdemeanor Appeals Court accepted the appeal filed by the defendant, identified as M.A.M. and known as Marwan Pablo, in form and ruled on the merits to cancel his jail sentence while upholding the previously imposed EGP 100,000 fine.
The court also ordered him to pay the criminal proceedings expenses in the case, which involves allegations of violating community values and publishing material deemed offensive to public decency through social media platforms.
Complaint Against Marwan Pablo
The case began after security authorities received a complaint alleging that the defendant had published audio clips through social media platforms using several accounts on TikTok.
According to the case documents, the clips contained statements and material that were considered offensive to public decency, leading to legal procedures and an investigation into the allegations.
Investigation Into the Case
The competent authorities investigated the incident, with case documents stating that the defendant had released several songs containing statements and expressions that investigators considered offensive and a violation of community values.
The investigation documents also stated that the musical works were published through the defendant’s official account on several digital platforms and included material described in the case file as offensive to public decency and community values.
Court Ruling in Marwan Pablo Case
After the case was considered by the court of first instance, the defendant appealed the ruling issued against him.
The Alexandria Economic Misdemeanor Appeals Court accepted the appeal in form and, on the merits, canceled the jail sentence while upholding the EGP 100,000 fine and ordering him to pay the criminal proceedings expenses.
What was the ruling against Marwan Pablo?
The court canceled the jail sentence and upheld a financial fine of EGP 100,000.
Which court issued the ruling?
The ruling was issued by the Alexandria Economic Misdemeanor Appeals Court.
What allegations did Marwan Pablo face?
The case involved allegations of violating community values and publishing material considered offensive to public decency.
Where was the material published?
According to the case documents, it was published through social media platforms, including TikTok accounts.
What happened after the first-instance ruling?
The defendant filed an appeal, and the appeals court canceled the jail sentence while upholding the fine.
