🏀 Mohamed Fares Discusses the Amr Zahran Incident
Mohamed Fares, a media figure covering Al Ahly, commented on the incident involving the club’s basketball player Amr Zahran, saying that the player’s conduct, in his view, was inappropriate and should not be justified or downplayed.
Fares stressed that Al Ahly should deal with the incident through its internal regulations, alongside any decision that may be issued by the Egyptian Basketball Federation within its own disciplinary framework.
📢 Fares Calls for an Internal Club Sanction
Mohamed Fares explained that an internal sanction from Al Ahly could give the player an opportunity to recognize the seriousness of his mistake and learn from the consequences.
He also pointed to the reaction surrounding the incident, saying that the matter had drawn criticism from sections of the Al Ahly fan base, making a clear internal response important in his view.
⚖️ Difference Between Club and Federation Sanctions
Fares highlighted the distinction between a sanction imposed by the club and one issued by the Basketball Federation, explaining that each institution operates under different rules and areas of authority.
The Basketball Federation has a unified set of disciplinary regulations that apply to clubs, meaning any decision it makes should fall within those rules and the federation’s jurisdiction.
At the same time, Fares argued that Al Ahly has the right to impose its own internal measures based on the club’s regulations, standards and the image it seeks to maintain.
🟨 “The Federation Uses Its Rules, Al Ahly Uses Its Regulations”
The media figure stressed that Al Ahly should not use the punishment imposed on a player at another club as a reference for deciding how to handle Amr Zahran’s case.
He also argued that the Basketball Federation should not consider any internal sanction imposed by Al Ahly as a substitute for the federation’s own disciplinary decision.
Fares said: “The federation holds players accountable under its regulations, while Al Ahly holds them accountable under its own rules and system. The two are not substitutes for each other.”
🔍 Separate Responsibilities
Mohamed Fares’ comments highlight the distinction between the responsibilities of a sports club and the governing federation.
A club’s internal disciplinary measures concern its direct relationship with its player and its own regulations, while federation sanctions are governed by the rules applicable to the competition and the sport as a whole.
According to Fares’ view, using both processes does not necessarily mean duplicating the same punishment, but rather allowing each authority to carry out its responsibilities within its own framework.
🔥 Attention Remains on Amr Zahran’s Case
The comments come as attention remains focused on the procedures surrounding the Amr Zahran incident, both at club level and within the Basketball Federation.
The final decisions remain with the relevant authorities, while Mohamed Fares’ position centers on separating Al Ahly’s internal responsibilities from the federation’s regulatory role when dealing with such incidents.
